Journal of a Voyage in 1811 and 1812 to Madras and China. 2

  • Info
  • Pages
  • Transcript
  • Related
Journal of a Voyage in 1811 and 1812 to Madras and China. 2
Journal of a voyage in 1811 and 1812, to Madras and China; returning by the Cape of Good Hope and St. Helena
WE00020B
Western
English
James Wathen (1751?-1828.0)
206-211
1814
London: J. Nichols, Son, and Bentley
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6

On the 20th of February we were invited to a grand dinner at the house
of a distinguished hong-merchant, of the name of Mauk-qua. This
personage transacted business with the Company to an immense annual
amount. The merchant resided at a splendid mansion, nearly adjoining the
European Factories. His warehouses were very extensive, and occupied a
large space of ground. About six o’clock the company began to assemble;
it consisted of all the gentlemen of the Factory, the India captains and
their principal officers, foreign merchants and Mandarins, the friends
of Mauk-qua and others, in the whole to the number of eighty persons. We
were all received in a large anti-chamber by Mauk-qua in person, to whom
every stranger was introduced in due form. At seven o’clock we were
shewn into the dining-saloon, which was lighted up with elegant lamps;
and here I met again with my pleasant fellow-voyager and ship-mate,
Hommagee, the Persian merchant, after a separation of many days. The
table was covered with a profusion of costly delicacies, dressed
according to the mode of several other nations as well as the Chinese.
On one side of the saloon, the curtains opened, and discovered an
elegant theatre richly decorated. The performers entered; and a play, or
sing-sang, commenced. The music was loud and harsh; but the company in
general paid much more attention to the exquisite dishes on the table
than to the play, although the players exerted themselves to the utmost,
to excite the notice and obtain the applause of their auditors. I
confess that I, also, had so bad a taste, or was so hungry, that I could
not discover the least beauty in the poetry, excellence in the acting,
or harmony in the music, until I had somewhat allayed the appetite which
the sight and smell of soups made of birds’-nests and sharks’-fins had
occasioned.

These soups, as well as most of the Chinese cookery, were served up in
small upright porcelain dishes. I tasted the soups, and found them
palatable and highly seasoned; but, as they are said to be stimulants of
a particular nature, I refrained from indulging my taste, and made my
dinner of some fine fish, and the substantial English dishes of roast
beef, and ham and fowls. Some excellent pastry and curious confectionary
succeeded; and the feast was concluded with a desert of fruit, among
which were fine large grapes, and deep-coloured Mandarin oranges of a
most exquisite flavour. The wines were Madeira and claret; but the
Chinese gentlemen preferred their own sam-soo to the European wines. The
sam-soo is a strong fiery spirit, and is said to be very unwholesome to
an European constitution.

I had now leisure to attend to the sing-sang, and the exertions of the
sons of Thespis—“the brief abstract and chronicles of the times;” but I
soon perceived that these heroes of the stage had never heard Hamlet’s
instructions to the players, or, if they had, they had not profited; for
“they so strutted, and bellowed, as if Nature’s journeymen had made men,
and not made them well, they imitated humanity so abominably!” Yet there
was a fable, a plot, and a catastrophe, to be distinguished even by us,
who were totally unacquainted with the language. Could an intelligent
Chinese discover as much in our most celebrated pieces; in our Hamlets,
our Othellos, and our Richards? I am afraid he would be tempted to call
them, as we did the sing-sang, “a tiresome bore!” Music, however, being
the universal language of Nature, is as universally understood. But if
the sounds we heard were delightful, or even tolerable, to the Chinese,
their auditory nerves must have been very differently constructed from
those which compose the European organs of hearing; for nothing could be
more harsh and discordant, than the noise proceeding from Mauk-qua’s
orchestra.

The fable of the piece represented, as I understood it from the action,
and the information of those sitting near to me, as follows: A governor
of a province at a great distance from the capital having a beautiful
daughter, bestowed her upon the son of a Mandarin in his province, who
was the next in authority to the governor, and who, under professions of
the utmost devotion and friendship to his superior, concealed a heart
full of baseness, envy, and avarice. He had no sooner obtained the
daughter of the governor for his son, than he began to employ all his
art and finesse to destroy the credit of his friend at court, and to
render his authority contemptible in the country. Forged complaints were
continually sent to the Emperor’s ministers of the mal-administration of
the governor, and the oppression he exercised towards those over whom he
presided. The son, whose disposition was the reverse of his father’s,
with the utmost humility, endeavoured to check his schemes with
intreaties, and even gentle remonstrances, sometimes hinting at the
fatal consequences to his father and himself in case of a discovery; but
without the least effect. At length the repeated complaints which the
treacherous Mandarin continued to send to court reached the Emperor’s
ears, who in consequence ordered the governor to come to Pekin to answer
for his conduct. His false friend now threw off the mask, and boldly
stood forth as his accuser, accompanied by others whom be had suborned,
whose evidence bore down the assertions of the governor, who had relied
upon the zeal and integrity of the Mandarin, but chiefly upon his own
innocence, for his defence. He was condemned to lose his head, and the
treacherous Mandarin was rewarded with his office. Hitherto his schemes
had succeeded, and his utmost wish was obtained: for his whole aim was
to succeed to the government by the destruction of his friend. His
virtuous son was, however, inconsolable; and though his filial piety
suppressed, it could not extinguish his emotions. There was one
individual, a Mandarin also of some consequence in the province, who had
silently observed the conduct of the false friend towards the governor,
but not with indifference. When this person was told what had happened
at Pekin, and that the traitor had been appointed governor, he
immediately collected a certain number of the most considerable men in
the province, and repaired to court with a petition in favour of the
condemned chief. They arrived just in time; for the preparations for his
execution were finished, and he on the point of being led to the fatal
spot where it was to take place. The good Mandarin threw himself at the
Emperor’s feet, loudly asserting the innocence of the victim; he
produced his respectable witnesses, many of them known to the ministers
for men of honour and probity. The execution was stayed; the prisoner
pardoned, and reinstated in his government; and his vile accuser, who
had remained at Pekin to enjoy the destruction of his friend, was
seized, tried, and condemned to suffer death.

It was now that the son displayed his filial piety and heroic virtue; he
found means to visit his father in his dungeon, changed cloaths with
him, and remained in his place, while the basest of criminals left him
to his fate, and fled to the Wilds of Tartary. The deception was not
discovered by the officers of Justice, who led the son to the place of
execution, where the finisher of the law took off his head with one
dextrous stroke of his scymitar. The head actually fell on the stage,
the body staggered a few steps, and fell also, covering the floor with
blood. How this was done, I was not informed; but I was assured that the
performer received no damage. Thus ended the Chinese Tragedy, the pious
fraud having been discovered when it was too late. A kind of epilogue
was recited in praise of filial duty, and inculcating obedience to
parents, even to death.

Although poetical justice is not observed in this drama, the moral it
enforces is popular among the Chinese. The passion of love is seldom the
subject of their dramatic pieces; but conjugal infidelity is often
brought on the stage, and exemplary punishment is inflicted on the
guilty party.

When the play at the hong-merchant’s was concluded, I observed that two
of his Mandarin guests were fast asleep; and a young Englishman had, by
taking “potations pottle deep,” brought his spirits into such a pitch of
riotous elevation, that he made more noise than the sing-sang, and was
much more troublesome.